Billionaire's Estate Tax
Summary
An open letter to the idiots in the NFIB who persist in calling the billionaire's estate tax and "death tax", and who now want people to tell their congressional representatives to oppose it, in the interests of "small business". As IF.
750 words
Citizens' Advisory Register [future] T-Shirts & Mugs [future] Donations [in progress] Send comments and suggestions |
by Eric Armstrong
[Note: Excerpts from the original message are reproduced below.]
Dear Representative of the NFIB:
You STUPID, short-term thinking, anti-social idiot.
The billionaire's estate tax you want to eliminate has a tremendously positive social benefit in the long term. It
helps to produce a meritocracy, where everyone has a chance to rise to a level of success equal to their
abilities.
The policy you recommend looks great right now, because you get to pass on to your kids the silver spoon you were either born with acquired along the way. But the long term consequences of that policy are deadly to society.
The result of that policy is an accumulation of wealth from generation to generation that produces an aristocracy of privilege, where a select few live well for no reason other than having had the luck to be born into the right circumstances.
I take it that you have little interest in creating a fair society. I doubt that you can even imagine what one is like.
To begin to get an idea, imagine for a moment that reincarnation is a reality. Now, forget all about the concept of repayment for past sins, or being reborn as a tomato. Just imagine that you might be reborn as anyone on the planet--anyone at all, of any race, creed, color, or nationality.
If you have ever experienced any disadvantages in your life, of any kind, that line of thought should give you the beginnings of a clue. If you haven't, then there is no hope that you will have the understanding necessary for the true comprehension of compassion. But if you have, then you must realize that the creation of an aristocratic minority means that the odds of your being a future member of that club are incredibly slim.
In other words, for every one life of easy and luxury you enjoy in your future lifes, you will endure a thousand lifetimes of hardship, misery, and deprivation.
If you imagine this recincarnation scenario throughly, it might just awaken a sense of compassion in you, because it is you who will endure those thousand undesirable lifetimes. The reality, of course, is that for every one person who enjoys a life of privilege and luxury today, a thousand others endure hardship and misery, while another ten thousand slave away their lives in the service of others to avoid it. (This is where it is important for you have to suffered some hardship in your life. Otherwise, you simply will not care, no matter what I may say.)
That future is the one that you aspire to, in your uncritical acceptance of the idea that a repeal of the bilionaire's estate tax is somehow a good idea.
As for the assertion that this tax somehow affects "small business", that is simply another damnable lie that billionaire Republicans are feeding people in order to preserve more money than 100 people could possibly spend in a thousand lifetimes. The last time this came around, the lie was that it was to "save the small farm".
That lie has long since been exposed. Now you've moved on to a different lie--in the same way that you attempt to portray the tax as a "death tax" as though it affects the lives of ordinary people, when the facts are manifestly otherwise.
Finally, even if there were an onerous impact on small businesses, then the solution would be some measure that works to hold the small business together--where small business is defined in such a way that it doesn't include international mega-corporations. But clearly, repealling the only tax that will have any impact on Bill Gate's 50 billion dollar fortune, along with those of other members of the billionaire's club, is not an idea that has any serious thinking behind it. It has plenty of selfishness, greed, and powerful money behind it. That's clear. But thinking? No. There is none of that.
NFIB/Grassroots (www.NFIB.com) wrote:
------------------------
> Time to Kill the Death Tax!
> Tell Your Senators that Compromise Will Destroy Small Business
>
> For the first time since 2001, the U.S. Senate appears ready to seriously consider death-tax repeal.
> But your opinion is critical leading up to the vote...because tax-relief foes may attempt to water down
> full, permanent repeal of this onerous tax.
>
> "The death tax kills jobs,"..."It forces capital out of America's family businesses at the time when
> they can least afford it - immediately after the death of one of the principal owners. It would be
> difficult to think of a more burdensome time to tax a business."
>
> ...additional crapola...
>
About Eric Armstrong
Eric Armstrong is computer systems designer, writer, and philosopher. He is currently working on a book that uses the principles of General Systems Theory to explain how America's epidemic of obesity and disease stems from profitable, but unhealthy, ingredients in the food supply; how the corporate financial system (and our own retirement plans) are complicit in the problem; how the American political system allows it to happen; and how our problems with the environment, a dwindling standard of living, and even our problems with the global economy all stem from the same constellation of systemic interactions. At www.treelight.com/health, he focuses on nutrition and fitness. At www.citizensAdvisory.org, his forming non-profit is working to get the money out of politics. At www.artima.com/weblogs, he writes about software, web technology, and development tools.
About Citizens' Advisory
Corporate money has hijacked the ballot box. The Citizens' Advisory aims to take it back. Our goal is to put people in charge of the political process. The voting-advice system recommended by the Citizens Advisory lets people choose advisors they trust. Done right, that system will enable multi-party coalitions in cyberspace. The system appeals to voters because it's convenient. It appeals to social activists and their organizations because it levels the political playing the field and empowers them with a stronger political voice.
Copyright © 2005 byCitizens'
Advisory.
All rights reserved.